Épuisé - Mot du Jour

Definition: (adj) - worn-out, exhausted Pronunciation: [ay  pwee  zay] Examples Le pauvre - il est à ©puisà © ! Poor thing - hes exhausted! Ma patience est à ©puisà ©e ; arrà ªte ! Im out of patience; stop it! Related à ©puiser - to wear out, exhaustà ©puisant - exhaustingà ©puisement - exhaustion

Similarities Between Christianity And Islam - 1088 Words

he Middle East is a significant historic province where it served as the birthplace for many beliefs and religions such as Christianity and Islam. Within 600 CE to 1250 CE and 1st century to 1000 CE, Christianity and Islam began to spread. The two leading religions were very apparent in their belief in God and worship. As we seek to understand the Christian and Islam beliefs, it is important to be familiar with both the similarities and differences in the early years. The thought of death may terrify most of us, but to those who believe in a higher power, death is the entrance to a beginning of eternal life. The similarity between Christianity and Islam is in the belief of not only spirits and demons, but of God, the one almighty creator. Both Christians and Muslims are monotheists, believing the same god, referred to as â€Å"Allah† by the Muslims and â€Å"God† by Christians. Both religions believe that if they do good deeds, they will go to the Kingdom of Heaven (Christian’s belief) or Paradise (Islam’s belief) to be with God. Correspondingly, they believe one will go to hell if sinful. They both have a written text that speaks the words of God; Christians uses the bible, and Islam reads the Qur’an, or the recitation. Mutually, the books hold the word of God and is the tool he has given us from which we learn how to find and live life. The Christian faith focuses on the holy trinity, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit (all one God in three persons). Still, Christianity is aShow MoreRelatedSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam993 Words   |  4 Pages Christianity and Islam are the two biggest religions that are present in the world today, with close to four billion followers combined. While Christianity and Islam actually have a lot more in common than most people think, there are still many differences to them. First, let’s start with the similarities between the two. Both religions believe that in one way or another, Jesus will return to Earth in the final days of the world to have a judgement day, in which essentially will determine if youRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1316 Words   |  6 PagesIn today’s world, the largest religion is Christianity with a 33 percent and Islam coming in second place at around 21 percent. According to the article A Common Word betwe en Us and You Both religions make up around half of the population around the world. Islam and Christianity are collectively known as Abrahamic religions because they trace their history to the covenant God made with Abraham in the Hebrew Bible. Christianity and Islam are two of the fastest growing religions, and they bothRead MoreSimilarities Between Islam And Christianity997 Words   |  4 PagesIslam and Christianity are two largely wide spread religions in the world that have a great impact on their followers, especially in a spiritual manner. Because of originality, values, and unique believes in each religion, their believers respect and try to comprehend each other’s faith. With Christianity’s record 2.2 billion population and Islam’s impressive 1.6 billion population, they both form the bases of their countries laws and are recognized by governments all around the world. Even thoughRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1427 Words   |  6 PagesChristianity and Islam share much common ground. They trace their origins to Abraham; believe in prophecy, apostles, revelation, scripture, resurrection, and life after death. Christianity and Islam have related theological traditions; believe in one omnipotent God who is concerned with human salvation. Both religions are somewhat similar in how they embrace their beliefs; what the church is to Christianity, the umma is to Islam. Notwithstanding these important similarities, however, these two worldviewsRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1409 Words   |  6 Pages Christianity and Islam were both spread in socially and economically similar and politically different. They both had an important people that role and spread of the religions. Christianity included the individuals of who believe in Jesus Christ. Christians are the flowers of the Christ who often believed is the son of the God (â€Å"the father†); Christians strongly believe that Christ will return after the next life; the end of the world. Islam consists of individuals who believe in Allah, the godRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1005 Words   |  5 Pages Compare and contrast ancient Christianity and Islam. Christianity and Islam are both closely related religions, because they are branched of Abraham and other patriarchs mentioned in Hebrew Scriptures. Examples of these books are the Old/ New testament and the Quran. These books serve as their spiritual ancestors and are also know as Abrahamic religions. Although these books have a massive amount in common the clash of these two religions has caused for a mass crimes and violence across humanityRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam891 Words   |  4 PagesChristianity came about 2000 years ago and was founded by Jesus Christ. It is mostly practiced in the Western world with a population of about 2 billion people. The name Christianity came from a Greek word ‘Christos’ meaning Jesus Christ and was founded between 4 B.C. and 30 A.D, and consist of the 3 major groups which are the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox. Islam on the other hand was founded about 1400 years ago by Muhammad in 600’s A.D. The word Islam is derived from an Arabic word forRead MoreSimilarities Between Christianity And Islam1332 Words   |  6 Pagesreligion has its own goal, and their own path and belief to reach their goals. However, there are many similarities in beliefs. Although the followers of Judaism, Christianit y, and Islam may see things differently, they all fundamentally hold the same values and codes. To Islam, the Prophet Mohammad’s teaching is a complete and final revelation. On the other hand, according to the bible, Christianity believes that Jesus Christ is the true lord and savior that will grant you the access to heaven in theRead MoreSimilarities Between Islam And Christianity1928 Words   |  8 Pagesget punished for practicing religion. The two religions bear some superficial similarities, the differences between the two religions is clear though. How the two religions practice their beliefs, the population, beliefs, and how they view â€Å"Jesus† are different and similar. Although the two religions are very different from each other, they also show some similarities. The main similarity is that Islam and Christianity both are monotheistic; meaning they believe in one god. Which are 2 out of theRead MoreSimilarities Between Islam And Christianity1619 Words   |  7 Pagessimilar beginnings, Islam is a religion of violence and Christianity is a religion of peace and therefore is more beneficial to society. It is important to understand the similarities between Islam and Christianity, specifically their origins, to better understand their differences. Islam is believed to have been started through the descendants of Abraham, a man who was considered a prophet of God in both Islam and Christianity. Many historians and theologians agree that Islam began through the lineage

Cloning 6 Essay Research Paper CloningIn recent free essay sample

Cloning 6 Essay, Research Paper Cloning In recent old ages the strong argument of human cloning has come into position after the cloning of the sheep Dolly, reasoning over the ethical and unethical issues has been the chief issue. After the cloning of Dolly President Bill Clinton put a five-year prohibition forestalling the usage of any or all-federal support towards human cloning. That does non halt the scientist with his or her ain money and courasity to experiment with human cloning. The unethical issue have played a major portion in this prohibition and every bit good as the sentiments of others. This is the hot subject in biological science, whether it s morally acceptable to clone people, ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) as it should be. The Cloning of worlds is morally unethical and would go against human self-respect. Cloning worlds has many different ethical positions and can be seen is different in everyone s positions. The value of a kid s life can be wholly changed. There will ever be a profound ethical difference between holding a kid and doing a kid. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) A kid begotten is ever seen as a gift, where as if a kid was manufactured or made it would ever be seen as a thing or merely a merchandise. The kid would non be respected for what he/she is, but priced for what it can make, hold or be used for. We re-joice in the God-given mastermind and applications that have materially improved all of our lives. However, non every scientific application of our century has been put to good usage ; some have been put to tragic abuse, even ruinous abuse on a graduated table no anterior century could woolgather of or recognize. Let us reason and hold with the late Paul Ramsey, who clearly stated: The Good things that work forces do can be made complet4e merely by the things they refuse to make. ( Fabricated Man: the moralss of Genetic Control ) Not merely would Cloning go against the self-respect of the human being cloned but what about the ringer itself? The ringer s biological fate will ever be previewed in the parent ; a Situation that would make legion ethical jobs of it s ain. ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) the ringer would see Biologically what happens to you in your parent. As the ringer goes and it will cognize that 40 it will go bald, depressed at 50, and Dead of Stomach Cancer at 60. The ringer nonvoluntary knows a batch more because they are traveling to hold all this biological information push upon them. Therefore if we knew genetically when and what we were traveling to decease of would the ringer be able to acquire insurance, because as it stands we have a bias on people with familial diseases, imagine if we knew the whole biological clock of a individual. In add-on to cognizing genetically what there future is like they with besides fell the torment of populating up to other peoples outlooks, based on the i ndividuality of the individual from which they were cloned. ( Voice of America 26-Mar-98 ) For illustration if Michael Jordan was cloned and at the age of ten old ages old his ringer broke his articulatio genus, would we see him worthless? Or would we set force per unit area on that ringer to go as great of a hoops participants as Micheal originally was. However, the ringer of a figure of different people would non turn out to be like there ringer, to get down cloning today, these ringers would non turn out to be like there ringer, even if the Deoxyribonucleic acid is precisely the same, they like us, were besides shaped by genetic sciences and environment likewise, with the religious capacity to measure, neglect, and at times to get the better of either or both, Each ringer would be capable to a alone set of environment influences. The job with cloning is non the mere fact the engineering is involved. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) Technology neer simply represents human command over nature ; it besides involves the power of some people over other people. ( John F. Killer, Stop Cloning Around 28-April-97. ) This is true in the familial revolution. As it is in the industrial revolution. When human cloning becomes technically possible, who will command who clones whom and for what means? Like atomic arms, the power to clone in the incorrect custodies could hold lay waste toing effects. There is Wisdom in President Clinton s immediate move to prevent human cloning research until the public argument and expert testimony have been digested and policies formulated, But there is even greater wisdom in neer puting pes on a way that leads from weather new sheep to made-to-order organ givers, industrial drones, and amour propre kids. The five-year prohibition set by President Clinton, was an first-class determination but that doesn T halt the in private funded scientist who has the engineering to make whatever they please. Presently there are no national Torahs forbiding the chase of human cloning with private financess. But there are proposals before the U.S. Congress and no fewer than 20 province legislative assemblies that would either prohibition or badly restrict human cloning and related research, irrespective of funding beginning. A lasting prohibition on human cloning is the best solution. As we enter the twenty-first century we look back on the old ages spent in the twentieth century and recognize that we have spent a century seeking to hold sex without babes and now we are seeking to hold babi Es without sex. Cloning In recent old ages the strong argument of human cloning has come into position after the cloning of the sheep Dolly, reasoning over the ethical and unethical issues has been the chief issue. After the cloning of Dolly President Bill Clinton put a five-year prohibition forestalling the usage of any or all-federal support towards human cloning. That does non halt the scientist with his or her ain money and courasity to experiment with human cloning. The unethical issue have played a major portion in this prohibition and every bit good as the sentiments of others. This is the hot subject in biological science, whether it s morally acceptable to clone people, ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) as it should be. The Cloning of worlds is morally unethical and would go against human self-respect. Cloning worlds has many different ethical positions and can be seen is different in everyone s positions. The value of a kid s life can be wholly changed. There will ever be a profound ethical difference between holding a kid and doing a kid. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) A kid begotten is ever seen as a gift, where as if a kid was manufactured or made it would ever be seen as a thing or merely a merchandise. The kid would non be respected for what he/she is, but priced for what it can make, hold or be used for. We re-joice in the God-given mastermind and applications that have materially improved all of our lives. However, non every scientific application of our century has been put to good usage ; some have been put to tragic abuse, even ruinous abuse on a graduated table no anterior century could woolgather of or recognize. Let us reason and hold with the late Paul Ramsey, who clearly stated: The Good things that work forces do can be made complet4e merely by the things they refuse to make. ( Fabricated Man: the moralss of Genetic Control ) Not merely would Cloning go against the self-respect of the human being cloned but what about the ringer itself? The ringer s biological fate will ever be previewed in the parent ; a Situation that would make legion ethical jobs of it s ain. ( Voice of America, 26-Mar-98 ) the ringer would see Biologically what happens to you in your parent. As the ringer goes and it will cognize that 40 it will go bald, depressed at 50, and Dead of Stomach Cancer at 60. The ringer nonvoluntary knows a batch more because they are traveling to hold all this biological information push upon them. Therefore if we knew genetically when and what we were traveling to decease of would the ringer be able to acquire insurance, because as it stands we have a bias on people with familial diseases, imagine if we knew the whole biological clock of a individual. In add-on to cognizing genetically what there future is like they with besides fell the torment of populating up to other peoples outlooks, based on the i ndividuality of the individual from which they were cloned. ( Voice of America 26-Mar-98 ) For illustration if Michael Jordan was cloned and at the age of ten old ages old his ringer broke his articulatio genus, would we see him worthless? Or would we set force per unit area on that ringer to go as great of a hoops participants as Micheal originally was. However, the ringer of a figure of different people would non turn out to be like there ringer, to get down cloning today, these ringers would non turn out to be like there ringer, even if the Deoxyribonucleic acid is precisely the same, they like us, were besides shaped by genetic sciences and environment likewise, with the religious capacity to measure, neglect, and at times to get the better of either or both, Each ringer would be capable to a alone set of environment influences. The job with cloning is non the mere fact the engineering is involved. ( Moral and Ethical Aspects of Cloning, 1998 ) Technology neer simply represents human command over nature ; it besides involves the power of some people over other people. ( John F. Killer, Stop Cloning Around 28-April-97. ) This is true in the familial revolution. As it is in the industrial revolution. When human cloning becomes technically possible, who will command who clones whom and for what means? Like atomic arms, the power to clone in the incorrect custodies could hold lay waste toing effects. There is Wisdom in President Clinton s immediate move to prevent human cloning research until the public argument and expert testimony have been digested and policies formulated, But there is even greater wisdom in neer puting pes on a way that leads from weather new sheep to made-to-order organ givers, industrial drones, and amour propre kids. The five-year prohibition set by President Clinton, was an first-class determination but that doesn T halt the in private funded scientist who has the engineering to make whatever they please. Presently there are no national Torahs forbiding the chase of human cloning with private financess. But there are proposals before the U.S. Congress and no fewer than 20 province legislative assemblies that would either prohibition or badly restrict human cloning and related research, irrespective of funding beginning. A lasting prohibition on human cloning is the best solution. As we enter the twenty-first century we look back on the old ages spent in the twentieth century and recognize that we have spent a century seeking to hold sex without babes and now we are seeking to hold babes without sex.